Myths vs Reality
Sources and Research
Every claim on the Myths vs. Reality page is grounded in evidence. This document collects the primary sources, government data, and peer-reviewed research behind each myth correction, organized so communicators can find, verify, and cite them in their own work.
Sources are organized by myth, in the same order they appear on the page. Each entry notes what the source establishes and links directly to the original document. Where possible, we cite primary sources: government agencies, peer-reviewed research, and established nonpartisan research institutions. We note where data has known limitations or where the picture is more complex than a single figure suggests.
Jump to a myth
MYTH #1
"Hunger is inevitable. It's always been here and always will be."
On hunger declining when programs expand.
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities documents that pandemic-era program expansions drove historic reductions in poverty and food insecurity, and that when those supports expired, poverty and hunger rose back sharply. This before-and-after pattern is the clearest available evidence that hunger responds directly to policy decisions.
Expiration of Pandemic Relief Led to Record Increases in Poverty and Child Poverty in 2022 | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 2023
On hunger as a policy outcome rather than a natural condition.
The National Strategy on Hunger, Nutrition, and Health, released following the 2022 White House Conference, establishes the federal government's framework for ending domestic hunger by 2030, explicitly treating hunger as a solvable policy problem rather than an inevitable social condition.
National Strategy on Hunger, Nutrition, and Health | The White House, 2022
On
narrative and public policy shaping whether progress is sustained.
FrameWorks Institute research shows that when people hold structural explanations for poverty and hunger rather than individual-blame narratives, they are significantly more likely to support policy solutions. Narrative is itself causal to whether hunger persists or is solved.
Moving Toward Collective Health and Prosperity Means Putting Hunger and Poverty in the Rearview Mirror | FrameWorks Institute, 2024
MYTH #2
"There isn't enough food for everyone."
On the scale of U.S. food waste.
USDA estimates that between 30 and 40 percent of the U.S. food supply is wasted, roughly 133 billion pounds annually at the retail and consumer levels alone, valued at approximately $161 billion. This is the primary federal estimate, cited consistently across USDA, FDA, and EPA.
Food Waste FAQs | USDA, updated periodically
usda.gov/about-food/food-safety/food-loss-and-waste/food-waste-faqs
On federal payments to farmers not to grow food.
USDA's Conservation Reserve Program pays farmers and landowners to take cropland out of production. In 2024, USDA issued more than $1.7 billion in annual rental payments through this program, covering nearly 26 million enrolled acres. This longstanding agricultural policy coexists with domestic food insecurity.
USDA Conservation Reserve Program Payment Announcement | USDA Farm Service Agency, October 2024
On food deserts in both urban and rural communities.
USDA defines food deserts as low-income areas more than half a mile from a supermarket in urban areas, or more than 10 miles in rural areas. An estimated 53.6 million people, or 17.4 percent of the U.S. population, live in low-income, low-access census tracts. Food deserts exist in both urban neighborhoods and rural areas where geography and economics limit access.
Food Access Research Atlas Documentation | USDA Economic Research Service
ers.usda.gov/data-products/food-access-research-atlas/documentation
MYTH #3
"This doesn't affect me or anyone I know."
On the share of food-insecure households above the poverty line.
Feeding America data consistently shows that the majority of food-insecure individuals live above the federal poverty line, earning too much to qualify for some assistance but too little to absorb rising costs. This directly challenges the assumption that hunger is limited to those in extreme poverty.
Map the Meal Gap: Food Insecurity and County-Level Data | Feeding America, annual
feedingamerica.org/research/map-the-meal-gap
On food insecurity in every county in the United States.
Feeding America's Map the Meal Gap tool provides county-level food insecurity estimates for all 3,000+ U.S. counties, consistently showing food insecurity present in every county, including affluent suburban counties.
Map the Meal Gap Interactive Tool | Feeding America, updated annually
On the role of narrative in making hunger visible or invisible.
FrameWorks Institute research demonstrates that when narratives about hunger focus on distant or extreme cases, audiences perceive the issue as remote from their own lives, reducing civic engagement. Localized, dignity-centered storytelling increases both recognition and motivation to act.
Talking About Poverty: Narratives, Counter-Narratives, and Telling Effective Stories | FrameWorks Institute, 2024
MYTH #4
"Hunger is an urban problem. It doesn't happen in communities like mine."
On food insecurity rates across urban, suburban, and rural areas.
The most recent USDA Household Food Security report (2024 data) shows that food insecurity was significantly higher in urban areas (16.0 percent) and rural areas (15.9 percent) compared to suburban areas (11.9 percent). Critically, suburban food insecurity rose sharply in 2023, up 18 percent compared to 2022, adding 2.4 million more people. Suburban communities are neither insulated nor stable — they contain the largest share (38.8 percent) of all food-insecure households in the country simply because of their population size.
Household Food Security in the United States in 2024 | USDA Economic Research Service, 2025
ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details?pubid=113622
On food insecurity existing in every county in America.
Feeding America's Map the Meal Gap tool provides county-level food insecurity estimates for all 3,000+ U.S. counties annually. The data consistently shows food insecurity present in every single county, including affluent suburban counties, directly contradicting the perception that hunger is geographically concentrated in cities or particularly poor regions.
Map the Meal Gap Interactive Tool | Feeding America, updated annually
On rural-specific food access barriers.
Rural communities face distinct structural barriers to food access including longer distances to grocery stores, limited public transportation, fewer employment options, and higher transportation costs. These barriers are separate from urban food access challenges but produce similar outcomes: unreliable access to adequate, affordable, nutritious food.
Rural Hunger and Access to Healthy Food Overview | Rural Health Information Hub
ruralhealthinfo.org/topics/food-and-hunger
On suburban food insecurity as an emerging and under-reported story.
The 2023 USDA food security data reveals that suburban and exurban households near principal cities, while having a lower food insecurity rate (11.7 percent) than cities or rural areas, nonetheless account for 38.8 percent of all food-insecure households nationally due to their large population share. This makes suburban hunger one of the most statistically significant and least covered dimensions of food insecurity in America.
Rural Households Accounted for Nearly One-Sixth of U.S. Food-Insecure Households in 2023 | USDA Economic Research Service, February 2025
ers.usda.gov/data-products/charts-of-note/chart-detail?chartId=110940
MYTH #5
"Hungry people look a certain way. I'd know one if I saw one."
On the demographics of food-insecure households.
USDA's annual Household Food Security report documents that food insecurity cuts across income levels, employment statuses, household types, and geographies, consistently contradicting stereotyped assumptions about what hunger looks like.
Household Food Security in the United States | USDA Economic Research Service, annual
ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-in-the-u-s/
On food insecurity defined by access, not appearance.
USDA defines food insecurity as a 'household-level economic and social condition of limited or uncertain access to adequate food.' This definition is based on access and reliability, not physical symptoms, reinforcing that hunger is often invisible to outside observers.
Food Security in the U.S.: Definitions of Food Security | USDA Economic Research Service
ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-in-the-u-s/definitions-of-food-security/
On stigmatizing imagery and its effects.
FrameWorks Institute research documents how visual framing choices shape public attitudes toward people experiencing hardship. Images that reinforce stereotypes increase social distance rather than building support for solutions.
Talking About Poverty: Narratives, Counter-Narratives, and Telling Effective Stories | FrameWorks Institute, 2024
MYTH #6
"Hungry is a holiday issue. We address it in November and December."
On summer child hunger and the loss of school meals.
No Kid Hungry's research documents that summer is one of the most acute periods of child food insecurity, because school meal programs that provide reliable nutrition during the academic year are unavailable for 90 days. Millions of children face a significant gap in food access during summer months.
Summer Hunger: The Facts | No Kid Hungry (Share Our Strength)
nokidhungry.org/what-we-do/summer-meals
On year-round food insecurity rates.
USDA's annual food security surveys measure food insecurity across all months of the year, consistently finding that the problem is structural and continuous, not concentrated during the holiday season. The charitable surge in November corresponds to one of the periods of relatively higher food bank resources, not one of highest unmet need.
Household Food Security in the United States | USDA Economic Research Service, annual
ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-in-the-u-s/
MYTH #7
"Kids are resilient. Childhood hunger doesn't leave lasting damage."
On the cognitive effects of childhood food insecurity.
Research documents that food insecurity during early childhood affects concentration, memory, and emotional regulation, and that children who experience hunger at home show lower scores in vocabulary, word recognition, and social-emotional development. These effects are observed independently of other poverty-related factors.
How Does Hunger Affect Learning? | No Kid Hungry (Share Our Strength), 2023
nokidhungry.org/blog/how-does-hunger-affect-learning
On lasting developmental consequences of early childhood hunger.
A peer-reviewed chapter in Springer's Educating the Young Child series documents that the cognitive effects of hunger include smaller brain size at birth, lower IQ and achievement test scores, and an inability to fully engage in school — effects that persist through adolescence and adulthood when nutrition deficits occur during critical developmental windows.
The Effects of Hunger on Physical and Cognitive Development of Children | Jepkemboi, G., Springer's Educating the Young Child series, 2018
link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-62887-5_10
On childhood hunger as a predictor of depression and long-term health consequences.
Research shows that childhood hunger is a predictor of depression in adolescence and young adulthood, and may contribute to mood disorders, behavioral problems, and substance abuse. An American Academy of Pediatrics report links early life stress from food insecurity to adverse long-term health outcomes including cardiovascular disease and autoimmune conditions.
Effects of Hunger on the Body and Child Development | No Kid Hungry (Share Our Strength)
MYTH #8
"If people just got a job, they wouldn't need food assistance."
On working adults among SNAP recipients.
A GAO report analyzing data from 11 states found that approximately 70 percent of adult wage earners in SNAP worked full-time hours (35 or more hours per week) on a weekly basis, and about half worked full-time annually. Most worked in the private sector, concentrated in restaurants, department stores, and grocery stores — industries that typically offer low wages without reliable benefits. Important note for communicators: this figure applies specifically to adult recipients with earned income, not to all SNAP recipients. A separate USDA snapshot measure shows 28 percent of all SNAP households had earned income at the time of receipt, with 55 percent of SNAP households with children reporting earned income.
Federal Social Safety Net Programs: Millions of Full-Time Workers Rely on Federal Health Care and Food Assistance Programs | U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), 2020
On earned income among SNAP households.
USDA's FY2023 SNAP Characteristics Report found that 28 percent of all SNAP households had earned income. Among SNAP households with children, 55 percent had earned income. The average SNAP household's gross monthly income is $1,059 — a figure that illustrates why employment alone does not protect against hunger when wages are this low.
Characteristics of SNAP Households: Fiscal Year 2023 | USDA Food and Nutrition Service, April 2025
fns.usda.gov/research/snap/characteristics-fy23
On the gap between full-time wages and the cost of housing.
NLIHC's 2025 Out of Reach report documents that in no state, metropolitan area, or county in the United States can a full-time worker earning the federal minimum wage afford a modest two-bedroom rental home at fair market rent. The average minimum-wage worker must work 116 hours per week — nearly three full-time jobs — to afford a two-bedroom rental. This structural gap between wages and the cost of living is the primary driver of hunger among the employed.
Out of Reach 2025: The High Cost of Housing | National Low Income Housing Coalition, 2025
On the industries where working SNAP recipients are employed.
The GAO analysis found that working adult SNAP recipients were heavily concentrated in five industries: food service and restaurants, retail trade, healthcare and social assistance, administrative support, and accommodation. These are among the lowest-wage, least stable employment sectors in the U.S. economy — precisely the industries where full-time work most frequently fails to provide income adequate to cover basic needs including food.
Federal Social Safety Net Programs: Millions of Full-Time Workers Rely on Federal Health Care and Food Assistance Programs | U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), 2020
MYTH #9
"Able-bodied adults shouldn't need help. They just need to work harder."
On whom receives SNAP benefits.
USDA's FY2023 characteristics report shows that four in five SNAP households include either a child, an elderly individual, or a nonelderly person with a disability. These households received 88 percent of all SNAP participants and 83 percent of all benefits.
Characteristics of SNAP Households: Fiscal Year 2023 | USDA Food and Nutrition Service, April 2025
fns.usda.gov/research/snap/characteristics-fy23
On the "deserving vs. undeserving" narrative and its policy effects.
FrameWorks Institute research shows that when poverty narratives invoke 'deservingness' frames, they activate individual-blame thinking rather than structural explanations, reducing support for effective programs regardless of those programs' actual track records.
Moving Toward Collective Health and Prosperity Means Putting Hunger and Poverty in the Rearview Mirror | FrameWorks Institute, 2024
MYTH #10
"People abuse benefits, so the programs are broken."
On intentional fraud vs. improper payments.
The improper payment rate for SNAP in FY2023 was approximately 11 percent, but USDA itself characterizes most of these as unintentional errors by state agencies or recipients, not deliberate fraud. States reported just $68 million in established fraud claims in FY2023, representing only 0.06 percent of total benefits issued. The high error rate and the low fraud rate are not the same figure — a critical distinction for communicators covering this topic.
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Errors and Fraud | Congressional Research Service, updated April 2025
congress.gov/crs-product/IF10860
On trafficking as the primary measure of intentional SNAP fraud.
The most recent USDA trafficking study, covering 2015 to 2017, found that 1.6 percent of SNAP benefits were trafficked — the sale of benefits for cash, primarily through retailer networks. This rate has fallen significantly from around 4 percent in the early 1990s.
The Extent of Trafficking in SNAP: 2015-2017 | USDA Food and Nutrition Service
fns.usda.gov/research/snap/extent-trafficking-2015-2017
On who the primary victims of SNAP fraud are.
Experts at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities note that the most damaging form of current SNAP fraud is EBT card skimming by organized criminal networks, meaning low-income recipients themselves are the primary victims.
Agriculture Focuses on SNAP Fraud, While Experts Worry EBT Theft Will Go Unabated | Nextgov/FCW, December 2025
On stigmas preventing eligible families from enrolling.
FRAC data from 2018 shows that approximately 18 percent of individuals eligible for SNAP did not participate, nearly one in five, with stigma and access barriers among the primary reasons. Participation rates are even lower among low-income working people.
The SNAP Gap: A State-by-State Glance | Food Research and Action Center (FRAC)
MYTH #11
"Undocumented immigrants are abusing food programs and taking resources from citizens."
On eligibility rules for non-citizens in federal nutrition programs.
Most undocumented immigrants are categorically ineligible for SNAP. Legal permanent residents may face waiting periods. U.S.-born children of undocumented parents are citizens and may be eligible, but fear of immigration consequences keeps many families from applying even for benefits their children qualify for.
SNAP Eligibility for Non-Citizens | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
cbpp.org/research/food-assistance/snap-works-for-immigrants
On immigrant households being underserved, not overserved.
Research consistently shows that immigrant families, including those with U.S. citizen children, are less likely to enroll in programs for which they are eligible compared to comparable non-immigrant households. Fear of immigration consequences, language barriers, and misinformation are the primary documented barriers.
Immigrant Access to Public Benefits Research | Urban Institute
urban.org/policy-centers/health-policy-center/projects/immigrant-access-public-benefits
MYTH #12
"Capitalism creates winners and losers. Hunger is just part of the system."
On hunger rates in comparable market economies.
The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations tracks food insecurity rates across high-income economies, consistently showing that countries with similarly market-based economies maintain substantially lower food insecurity rates, attributable to stronger safety nets, higher minimum wages, and more robust family support programs.
The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), annual
On hunger as a result of policy gaps rather than market requirements.
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities documents extensively how SNAP, WIC, school meals, and other federal programs directly reduce poverty and food insecurity, and how cuts to these programs directly increase both. The evidence that policy choices, not market mechanics, determine hunger rates is the CBPP's core body of work.
SNAP and Federal Nutrition Program Research | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
MYTH #13
"Food banks have it covered. The charitable system handles this."
On the scale of SNAP compared to charitable food systems.
SNAP served an average of 41.7 million people per month in FY2024 at a total cost of approximately $99.8 billion. The scale, consistency, and reach of federal programs vastly exceeds what the charitable system can provide.
SNAP Key Statistics and Research | USDA Economic Research Service, FY2024
On food bank demand increasing when federal programs are cut.
Feeding America's research consistently documents that when SNAP benefits are reduced or eligibility is restricted, food bank usage increases. This inverse relationship directly contradicts the claim that charity can substitute for federal programs.
Feeding America Research Library | Feeding America
MYTH #14
"We've tried everything and nothing works."
On SNAP's effectiveness in reducing poverty and food insecurity.
A 2025 Urban Institute analysis found that SNAP benefit increases from the 2021 Thrifty Food Plan reevaluation alone kept 2.9 million people out of poverty, including 1.3 million children, representing a 6 percent reduction in child poverty nationally.
SNAP Increase Kept 2.9 Million People Out of Poverty after Thrifty Food Plan Update | Urban Institute, 2025
On pandemic-era expansions cutting child poverty to historic lows.
In 2021, federal pandemic relief drove the largest single-year drop in child poverty on record, bringing the child poverty rate to a historic low of 5.2 percent. When those supports expired in 2022, poverty and food insecurity rose sharply, with 5 million more children living in poverty by year's end.
Government's Pandemic Response Turned a Would-Be Poverty Surge Into a Record Poverty Decline | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 2023
On WIC's documented health outcomes.
A systematic review commissioned by USDA and published in Annals of Internal Medicine identified 82 studies on WIC outcomes, finding consistent evidence that WIC participation is associated with improved birth outcomes, lower rates of preterm birth and low birth weight, lower infant mortality, and better child cognitive development.
Maternal and Child Outcomes Associated With the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), 2022
MYTH #15
"There are more urgent issues right now. Hunger can wait."
On current food insecurity levels.
Analysis of December 2024 data from the Urban Institute's nationally representative Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey found that food insecurity and charitable food receipt plateaued at high rates, remaining significantly above prepandemic levels. USDA More than one in four adults reported food insecurity in 2024, unchanged from the high rates observed in 2023. A follow-up 2025 study found food insecurity remained high, with nearly one in three working-age adults living with children reporting food insecurity in 2025, and more than half of working-age adults in families at or below 200 percent of the federal poverty level reporting food insecurity.
Households Faced Persistent Challenges Affording Food in 2024 Gonzalez, Karpman, Gupta, and Waxman | Urban Institute, March 2025 urban.org/research/publication/households-faced-persistent-challenges-affording-food-2024
Follow-up: Food Insecurity Remained High in 2025, As Safety Net Cuts Loom Urban Institute, March 2026
urban.org/research/publication/food-insecurity-remained-high-2025-safety-net-cuts-loom
On federal nutrition programs under current political pressure.
Congressional budget proposals since 2024 have included significant proposed cuts to SNAP and related nutrition programs. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities tracks these legislative developments and their projected impacts in real time.
SNAP and Federal Nutrition Program Policy Tracker | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
MYTH #16
"One person can't make a difference on something this big."
On narrative change preceding policy change.
FrameWorks Institute's multi-decade research portfolio documents case after case in which shifts in public narrative and framing preceded and enabled policy change. Their UK poverty work produced a 25 percent increase in media coverage of poverty and secured measurable policy changes, driven by training communicators to tell a different story.
Reframing in Action: Talking About Poverty to Solve Poverty in the UK | FrameWorks Institute
On communicators as drivers of cultural and policy change.
Two bodies of peer-reviewed research are directly relevant here. The first is Nicholas Christakis and James Fowler's social contagion work at Yale, which established that beliefs, behaviors, and social norms spread through networks with a "three degrees of influence" property, meaning what you believe affects your friends, your friends' friends, and your friends' friends' friends. The second is Damon Centola's complex contagion research, developed at MIT and Penn, which found that behavioral and belief change, unlike simple information, requires reinforcement from multiple trusted sources before it spreads. This directly explains why communicators in trusted daily environments matter more than data exposure alone.
Social Contagion Theory: Examining Dynamic Social Networks and Human Behavior N.A. Christakis and J.H. Fowler | Statistics in Medicine, 32(4): 556-577, 2013
How Behavior Spreads: The Science of Complex Contagions Damon Centola | Princeton University Press, 2018
press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691175317/how-behavior-spreads
The Truth About Behavioral Change (accessible summary of Centola's research) MIT Sloan Management Review, 2018
sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-truth-about-behavioral-change/
Your craft is part of the solution.
Sixteen myths. Millions of communicators who can help correct them.
The tools, language, and community are here. What happens next depends on what you choose to do with your platform.
Some communicators choose to identify with a professional community engaging hunger with accuracy, dignity, and purpose.
Count Me In is a voluntary, professional opt-in. No obligation. No prescribed messaging.
No obligation. Free. Designed for communicators.
